Category Archives: Relationships & Emotional Wellbeing

Soul Connection or Trauma Bond? Understanding Intense Relationships

Leave a reply

Some relationships are difficult to explain. The attraction can feel unusually powerful, the connection profound, and the emotional pull difficult to understand. Even when a relationship becomes painful, confusing or destructive, letting go may feel almost impossible. When we find ourselves in this kind of psychological darkness, we naturally look for an explanation. We want to understand why this person affects us so deeply, why we keep returning, and why the relationship can feel so difficult to leave.

For some people, the explanation may be found in the language of soul connection, karma or destiny. For others, it may be love, loyalty or the belief that the relationship has a deeper purpose. These ideas can provide meaning when an experience feels confusing or painful. But there is another question worth asking: could some of what feels like an extraordinary connection also be produced by the relationship pattern itself? This is where psychology can offer another lens through which to understand intense relationships.

What do we mean by a soul connection?

The word soul can mean different things to different people. For many, it describes their deepest inner experience: the part of themselves they experience as most authentic, intuitive, private or profoundly connected to life and to other people.  Someone may therefore describe a relationship as a soul connection because it reaches somewhere deep within them. The experience may feel unlike anything they have known before. We don’t necessarily have to decide whether that experience is spiritual, psychological or both. What matters is recognising that a profound inner experience is real as an experience. But there is an important distinction: A profound inner experience does not necessarily mean that the relationship producing it is right for us. Nor does feeling deeply connected to someone necessarily mean that they are the one.

We can confuse the depth of our experience with the health of the relationship. A relationship can feel extraordinary and still be unhealthy. It can be deeply meaningful and still not be sustainable.

When intensity becomes evidence

Imagine a relationship in which there is extraordinary attraction and closeness, followed by conflict, withdrawal or uncertainty. Separation creates anxiety, while reconnection brings enormous relief. The relationship may move between intense intimacy and painful disconnection. Because the feelings are so powerful, we may conclude that the relationship itself must therefore be extraordinary.

But what if the intensity is partly being produced by the pattern? This is one of the questions raised by the psychological concept of trauma bonding.

A trauma bond is not simply an intense relationship, nor does every difficult relationship involve one. Trauma bonding can develop in relationships characterised by cycles of harm and intermittent reward, particularly where there is a significant imbalance of power or control.

The cycle may look something like this: connection › rupture › anxiety › uncertainty › reconciliation › relief › renewed connection.

The periods of affection or closeness can become especially powerful because they interrupt the distress. We may find ourselves becoming attached not only to the person, but to the relief we experience when the relationship feels secure again. This can create a powerful emotional loop. And this is where the question becomes important: Could the intensity itself be partly produced by the relationship pattern?

It doesn’t invalidate the feelings. It gives us another way of understanding them.

When we are searching for meaning

When we are psychologically in the dark, we naturally reach for explanations. A soul connection can provide one. So can the idea of a soul connection, karma or destiny. Perhaps this person was meant to enter our life. Perhaps there is something we are supposed to learn from the relationship. Perhaps the difficulty has a deeper purpose. These beliefs are meaningful to the person holding them. The psychological question isn’t to remove that meaning but to explore the underlying issue.

Has the meaning we attach to a connection begun to prevent us from seeing what is happening in front of us?

A relationship can have meaning without being healthy. A relationship can teach us something without requiring us to remain in it. A relationship can be deeply significant without being destined to continue. Sometimes we can become so focused on what a relationship is meant to represent that we lose sight of what it is actually doing to us.

When meaning becomes obligation

This can be particularly important when we believe that a difficult relationship is something we are supposed to work through. We might unconsciously interpret repeated difficulties as evidence that there is still a lesson to learn. Perhaps the relationship is challenging us for a reason. Perhaps we haven’t yet understood what we came here to learn. Perhaps leaving would mean abandoning something that was meant to be completed. But there is another possibility.

Perhaps the difficulty itself is information.

Instead of asking only what the relationship is trying to teach us, we can ask what the relationship is showing us. How do I feel within this relationship? What happens to my sense of self? Am I becoming more myself or less myself? Am I able to express my needs and boundaries? Am I staying because I freely choose to be here, or because leaving feels impossible?

These questions don’t dismiss the meaning we have given to the relationship. They introduce something equally important: agency.

When relationships become behaviour patterns

Intense relationships can also develop recurring patterns in which both people become caught in familiar roles. Karpman’s Drama Triangle describes three common positions: Persecutor, Victim and Rescuer. These are not fixed identities, and people can move between them, sometimes within the same relationship.

The Persecutor may justify controlling, critical or harmful behaviour as a way of helping the other person grow. Difficult behaviour can become reframed as teaching, strengthening or correcting.

The Victim may begin to see suffering as something inevitable, deserved or destined. The relationship becomes something to endure or something from which a lesson must eventually be learned.

The Rescuer may feel responsible for saving, healing or protecting the other person. They may understand the other person’s wounds so deeply that they begin to excuse behaviour that is hurting them.

The desire to rescue can be particularly complicated because compassion may be genuine. Yet continually taking responsibility for another person’s wellbeing can subtly undermine both people’s agency. The person being rescued may come to be seen as incapable of managing without help, while the rescuer may derive an unconscious sense of worth from being needed.

These patterns can keep a difficult relationship going even when both people are unhappy. Understanding the pattern does not mean blaming either person. It gives us another small opening through which to see what is happening.

Understanding isn’t the same as excusing

We can understand someone’s childhood, attachment style, trauma, insecurity or emotional wounds. We can recognise why they behave as they do. But understanding does not require us to accept the impact of their behaviour. Likewise, recognising that someone has been hurt does not make us responsible for healing them. Compassion allows another person to have responsibility for their own growth. Rescuing can take that responsibility away from them while gradually asking us to carry more than is ours to carry. Sometimes what looks like devotion is actually self-abandonment. Sometimes what looks like loyalty is fear. And sometimes what looks like an unbreakable connection is a relationship pattern that has become very difficult to step outside.

How counselling can help

In counselling, we can explore these patterns without dismissing the meaning a relationship holds for you. My approach draws on talking therapy, attachment, CBT and psychodynamic perspectives to help you understand the beliefs, emotional responses and relationship patterns that may be keeping you stuck. The aim is not to tell you what your relationship means or what decision you should make, but to create enough space to recognise what you are experiencing, reconnect with your own perspective and make choices from a stronger sense of self.

Finding a pinprick of light

Perhaps we don’t always need to decide whether a connection is spiritual or psychological. We can honour the depth of what we have experienced while also examining the relationship honestly. A connection can be profound and still be unhealthy. It can change us without being meant to last. It can teach us something without being our destiny. The question may therefore be less about whether someone is our soul connection and more about what the connection is doing to us.

If we put aside, just for a moment, what the relationship is supposed to mean, what can we see about what is actually happening?

This is where psychological awareness can offer a small pinprick of light in the darkness. Not necessarily an answer, and not someone else telling us what we should do, but enough light to see that we have choices. We can begin to distinguish intensity from intimacy, meaning from obligation, understanding from excusing, and connection from compatibility.

And perhaps the deepest question is not Why was I drawn to this person?

but: What am I free to choose now?

The above article reminds me of a poem I wrote a few years ago:

Poems like prayers slip through the cracks that hide my shadows;

Had I not learned to pray on the cold, hard tiles of mercy,

you would find me on the other side of darkness,

desperately trying to punch stars into the sky.

Collette O’ Mahony is a Psychotherapeutic Counsellor in private practice, working with clients online. She writes regularly on mental health and emotional wellbeing, with a focus on self-discovery, developing self-awareness, and supporting individuals to take meaningful responsibility for their inner lives.

When Fear Looks Like Jealousy: Understanding Trust, Insecurity and Attachment

Leave a reply

Jealousy can be one of the most difficult emotions to navigate in an intimate relationship. It can appear as questioning, checking, comparing, withdrawing, accusing or needing constant reassurance. Sometimes it follows a genuine breach of trust, such as infidelity. At other times, it seems to appear without any obvious cause.

But jealousy is rarely just about the person or situation in front of us. Often, it is connected to something deeper: our experience of trust, attachment, self-esteem and what we have learned to expect from relationships. The challenge is knowing when jealousy is telling us something important about the relationship, and when fear is filling in the gaps.

When the past enters the present

Imagine someone has discovered that a previous partner was unfaithful. Even after leaving that relationship, their nervous system may remain alert to the possibility of betrayal. A partner taking longer to reply, becoming more private with their phone or appearing particularly interested in someone else may activate an immediate sense that something is wrong. This can lead to hypervigilance.

The person begins looking for signs of danger, often without consciously choosing to do so. They may check messages, ask repeated questions or seek reassurance. For a short while, reassurance brings relief. But because the underlying fear has not been resolved, the vigilance returns.

A cycle can develop: Past betrayal → heightened vigilance → ambiguous behaviour → threat interpretation → anxiety → checking or questioning → temporary reassurance → renewed vigilance

The person may believe they are simply being careful. Underneath the behaviour, however, there may be a deeper fear that they do not want to be hurt like that again.

Attachment and the fear of being left

Our early experiences of relationships can also influence how we respond to uncertainty in adult relationships. Someone with an anxious attachment pattern may be particularly sensitive to changes in closeness. A delayed message, a partner becoming distracted or a perceived change in affection can trigger questions such as:

Are they losing interest? Have I done something wrong? Is there someone else?

The intensity of the response may seem disproportionate to the immediate situation because the present moment has activated something older. At the heart of the reaction may not actually be jealousy. It may be a fear of rejection, abandonment or not being enough. This is where jealousy can become an expression of insecurity.

When low self-esteem becomes an accusation

Low self-esteem can be particularly complicated within relationships. Instead of recognising our vulnerabilities, or low expectations for the relationship, the fear can become directed towards our partner: Why were you talking to her? You obviously fancy him. Why did you like their social media post?

An internal fear has become an external accusation. This does not mean that every jealous person has low self-esteem, nor does it mean that concerns about a partner are necessarily irrational. It simply reminds us that sometimes what we believe we are seeing in another person is partly being shaped by what we believe about ourselves.

Prediction versus evidence

One of the most useful questions to ask when jealousy arises is: Am I responding to evidence, or am I responding to a prediction?

Our minds are constantly making predictions. If we have previously experienced betrayal or rejection, we may become particularly skilled at anticipating it happening again. But there is an important difference between what we observe and what we conclude.

Observation: My partner has been spending more time on their phone.

Interpretation: They seem more private than usual.

Prediction: They must be talking to someone else.

Conclusion: They must be having an affair.

These stages can happen almost instantaneously, particularly when we are emotionally activated. The difficulty is that the feeling of certainty can become stronger than the evidence itself. Before acting on suspicion, it can help to pause and ask what do we actually know and what are we assuming? What am I predicting and is this situation connected to something that happened in the past? What evidence supports our concern and what evidence might not fit that fear?

This does not mean dismissing intuition. It means giving ourselves enough space to understand where the intuition is coming from.

What if something really doesn’t feel right?

There is another side to this. Sometimes we become so concerned about being perceived as jealous or insecure that we can dismiss our own observations entirely. We convince ourselves that we are imagining things, or being paranoid. We tell ourselves that we shouldn’t feel that way.

Yet a genuine change in a partner’s behaviour should not automatically be explained away as insecurity. If someone becomes unusually secretive, repeatedly contradicts themselves, breaks agreed boundaries or behaves in ways that genuinely undermine trust, it is reasonable to pay attention. The aim is therefore not to tell ourselves to always trust our instincts, nor to always distrust them. Instead, we can become curious about them. We can pause and reflect that something doesn’t feel right; but we don’t yet know what it means. That small pause can make an enormous difference.

When concern is dismissed

Relationships also become difficult when one partner repeatedly raises a concern and the other simply dismisses it as an overactive imagination, or that we are too sensitive, too suspicious.

Sometimes reassurance is entirely appropriate. A partner may genuinely be experiencing the present through the lens of previous hurt. But repeated dismissal does not necessarily resolve the underlying issue. A healthy relationship needs space for both people to express uncertainty and discomfort without immediately turning the conversation into a battle over who is right.

The question becomes: Can we explore what is happening together?

There is a significant difference between an invitation to talk and an accusation, or demand for an explanation. Invitation opens a conversation. Accusation can turn fear into control.

Understanding where jealousy comes from may help us understand a behaviour, but it does not automatically justify controlling, intimidating or intrusive behaviour.

Learning to trust yourself, and your partner

Trust is not the absence of uncertainty. It is the ability to tolerate some uncertainty without immediately needing to eliminate it through checking, controlling, accusing or withdrawing. For someone who has experienced betrayal, rebuilding trust may take time. For someone whose jealousy is rooted in insecurity, developing greater self-worth and emotional regulation may be part of the work. And for couples, learning to communicate vulnerability without accusation can create a very different pattern.

Instead of wondering if our fears are well-founded, or if we can prove our fears to be misplaced, we might ask: What is happening here, and can we stay present long enough to understand it?

Jealousy is an emotion. It can contain fear, hurt, insecurity and sometimes useful information about a relationship. But an emotion is not the same as evidence. Learning to recognise the difference between what happened, what we fear, and what we have learned to expect can help us step out of the cycle of vigilance and begin to approach relationships with greater self-awareness, honesty and trust.

How counselling can help

Counselling can provide a space to look beneath jealousy and suspicion rather than simply trying to suppress the feelings themselves. Part of this work can also involve developing greater self-trust. Rather than relying entirely on a partner’s reassurance to determine whether we are safe, loved or worthy, counselling can help us develop a stronger internal point of reference. This means becoming more able to listen to our own feelings and perceptions, consider the evidence, make sense of our experiences and arrive at our own conclusions without automatically surrendering that judgement to either our fears or another person’s reassurance. If you recognise recurring patterns in your relationships and would like to understand them more deeply, I offer online psychotherapeutic counselling for relationship difficulties, attachment patterns and emotional wellbeing.

The aim is not to become completely independent of others, nor to stop caring what a partner thinks. It is to develop enough inner security to ask important relationship questions. Self- trust allows us to make clear choices based on the information we receive.

Collette O’ Mahony is a Psychotherapeutic Counsellor in private practice, working with clients online. She writes regularly on mental health and emotional wellbeing, with a focus on self-discovery, developing self-awareness, and supporting individuals to take meaningful responsibility for their inner lives.

When Attachment Styles Meet: The Relationship Beneath the Relationship

Leave a reply

We often think about relationships in terms of what we can see. One person wants more closeness. The other wants more space. One needs reassurance. The other becomes frustrated by the need for reassurance. One wants to talk about what has happened. The other shuts down. One feels ignored. The other feels pressured. On the surface, these can look like communication problems. But beneath the conversation, something else may be taking place.

Attachment can influence not only how we relate to another person, but how we experience ourselves within a relationship; whether we feel secure enough to express our needs, whether distance feels threatening, whether closeness feels comforting or overwhelming, and how quickly we interpret another person’s behaviour as a sign that something is wrong. This is where understanding attachment can take us beyond the question, Which attachment style am I? A more useful question may be: What happens between us when our attachment patterns meet?

Attachment is activated in relationship

Attachment is not simply a label we carry around with us. Our early experiences can contribute to expectations about relationships; whether other people are available, whether our needs will be noticed, whether closeness is safe, and whether we can remain ourselves while being emotionally connected to someone else. These expectations can remain outside our conscious awareness until a relationship activates them. A delayed message may therefore become more than a delayed message. A partner needing time alone may feel like rejection. A request for reassurance may feel like pressure. A change in someone’s tone of voice may be experienced as a warning that something is wrong. The reaction can seem disproportionate to the event because the emotional response is not necessarily coming from the event alone. The present situation may have touched something much older. This is one reason relationships can sometimes feel confusing. We may know intellectually that something is relatively small, yet emotionally it can feel much bigger.

The subliminal communication pattern

This connects with something I explored in my earlier article, The Conversation Beneath the Conversation. What we say to each other is not always the whole communication. A disagreement about spending time together may contain a deeper question: Do I matter to you? A disagreement about needing space may contain: Can I have some independence without losing the relationship? A disagreement about commitment may contain: Can I trust that you will still be here?

Beneath a strong reaction to another person’s needs there may be an equally important question: Can I be close to someone without losing myself?

These questions are not always consciously spoken. Sometimes they are communicated through behaviour instead. We may pursue, withdraw, become defensive, become overly accommodating, seek reassurance, become controlling, shut down or avoid difficult conversations. The behaviour may make sense when we understand what it is trying to protect.

When protection meets protection

One of the difficulties in relationships is that two people can be trying to feel safe in completely different ways. Imagine someone who becomes anxious when they sense emotional distance. Their instinct may be to move towards the other person; to talk, ask questions, seek reassurance or try to resolve the uncertainty. Now imagine that the other person experiences emotional intensity as overwhelming. Their instinct may be to create space; to become quiet, withdraw, delay the conversation or retreat into themselves. Each person is attempting to regulate their own discomfort. But their protective responses can inadvertently activate the other person’s. The more one person seeks closeness, the more the other may feel the need for space. The more the other withdraws, the more the first person may feel the need to seek reassurance.

A cycle begins:

Distance → anxiety → pursuit → pressure → withdrawal → greater anxiety → further pursuit.

At some point, the original issue may almost disappear. The relationship is now responding to the pattern itself. Neither person necessarily intended to create it. Neither may understand why the same argument keeps happening. And both may feel that the other person is the problem.

When our interpretation becomes part of the pattern

Attachment can also influence the meaning we give to another person’s behaviour. This is important because we do not respond only to what happens. We respond to what we believe what happens means. A partner becoming quiet might mean: “They need some time to think.”

Or it might mean: They are losing interest in me.

A partner wanting an evening alone might mean: They value their independence. Or: “They don’t want to be with me.”

Someone asking for reassurance might mean: They are feeling vulnerable and want connection. Or: Nothing I do will ever be enough.

The behaviour may be the same; the internal meaning can be very different. This is why developing awareness of our own attachment responses can be so valuable. It creates a small space between what happens and what we immediately believe it means. Within that space, something different becomes possible.

Secure attachment is not perfect attachment

It can be tempting to think of secure attachment as the absence of insecurity, conflict or difficult emotions. Real relationships are rarely that simple. Even someone who generally experiences relationships as secure can feel jealous, rejected, frightened, angry or overwhelmed. The difference is not necessarily whether we become activated; it is what happens when we do. Can I recognise that something has been triggered in me? Can I pause before reacting? Can I distinguish what I know from what I fear? Can I communicate my experience without assuming I know what the other person is thinking? Can I allow my partner to have a different perspective without experiencing that difference as a threat to the relationship?

And perhaps most importantly: Can we repair?

A healthy relationship does not require two people to get everything right. It requires enough emotional safety for both people to acknowledge when something has gone wrong and find their way back to one another.

Staying connected without losing yourself

There is another dimension to attachment that is sometimes overlooked. Attachment is not only about how securely we connect with another person. It can also influence how securely we remain connected to ourselves. Some people become highly attuned to the needs, feelings and expectations of those around them. They may become so focused on maintaining harmony that their own preferences gradually become difficult to recognise. Others may protect themselves through emotional distance. Independence becomes so important that vulnerability can feel uncomfortable or even unsafe.

In both situations, an important question can become lost: What am I actually feeling, thinking or needing?

Being in a relationship does not require us to abandon ourselves. Nor does maintaining ourselves require emotional distance from others. A mature relationship allows both people to exist. I can be close to you and still be me. You can be different from me and I can remain secure in myself.

You can have your needs and I can have mine.

This is part of what makes emotional intimacy possible.

Moving from reaction towards awareness

Understanding attachment is not about deciding which person is anxious, which person is avoidant, or who is responsible for the problems within a relationship. It is about becoming curious about the pattern. When something happens, we might begin by asking: What happened? Then: What did I immediately believe it meant? What did I feel? What did I want to do? What was I trying to protect? And perhaps: What might my response have communicated to the other person?

This does not mean taking responsibility for another person’s behaviour. It means becoming more aware of our own part in the interaction. Awareness gives us choices that automatic reaction does not. We may discover that underneath anger there is fear. Underneath withdrawal there may be vulnerability. Underneath the need for reassurance there may be a longing to feel valued. Underneath the need for distance there may be a need to feel autonomous and emotionally safe. The behaviour is not the whole story. There is usually a relationship beneath the relationship.

We bring our history into relationships, but we are not confined by it

Our early relationships can influence the expectations and protective patterns we bring into adult relationships. But attachment is not a life sentence. Awareness can change the way we understand ourselves. A person who once automatically pursued may learn to pause and communicate their need more directly. A person who habitually withdrew may learn that remaining present during difficult conversations does not necessarily mean losing themselves. Two people may begin to recognise the cycle they have been caught in rather than continuing to fight each other from within it. This is where psychotherapy can offer something particularly valuable. Rather than simply asking “Why do I behave like this?”, therapy can help us become curious about the experiences, meanings and emotional patterns beneath our behaviour. Over time, we can begin to recognise the moment when an old expectation enters a present relationship. And perhaps that is where change begins. Not by becoming a different person. Not by achieving perfect security. But by becoming sufficiently aware to notice: Something has been activated in me. And from there, we can begin to ask: What belongs to the past, what belongs to the present, and how would I like to respond now? Because the goal of understanding attachment is not to find the perfect attachment style. It is to develop a greater capacity for connection; with another person, and with ourselves.

If you recognise recurring patterns in your relationships and would like to understand them more deeply, I offer online psychotherapeutic counselling for relationship difficulties, attachment patterns and emotional wellbeing.

Collette O Mahony is a Psychotherapeutic Counsellor in private practice, working with clients online. She writes regularly on mental health and emotional wellbeing, with a focus on self-discovery, developing self-awareness, and supporting individuals to take meaningful responsibility for their inner lives.

The Conversation Beneath the Conversation: How Attachment Styles Shape Our Relationships

1 Reply

Many of the difficulties we experience in relationships are not really about what appears to be happening on the surface. A couple may argue about how often someone texts. A parent and adult child may disagree about how often they see one another. Friends may fall out because one person has become quieter or more distant. The conversation may appear to be about messages, time, attention or behaviour. But beneath the conversation can be deeper questions:

Are you still there for me? Can I depend on you? Do I matter to you?

Attachment theory offers one way of understanding why two people can experience the same interaction so differently. Our attachment patterns can influence what we notice, what we fear and, perhaps most importantly, what we believe another person’s behaviour means. The same words can create very different emotional responses depending on the attachment system listening to them.

When the Anxious Person Reaches for Connection

Someone with an anxious attachment pattern may be particularly sensitive to changes in closeness or connection. A delayed message, a different tone of voice or a partner becoming quieter than usual can quickly activate fears of rejection or abandonment. The difficulty is that the underlying need for reassurance does not always emerge as reassurance-seeking.

Instead of saying, “I’m feeling disconnected from you and I need some reassurance,” the person may ask: “Why haven’t you called me?”

The other person may hear criticism, pressure or accusation. But beneath the words may be something much more vulnerable where the anxious person needs to know they still matter to you. When this need is not understood, both people can become increasingly frustrated. One person believes they are asking for connection, while the other believes they are being criticised.

When the Avoidant Person Creates Distance

Someone with an avoidant attachment pattern may respond to emotional intensity in a very different way. Where one person moves towards connection when distressed, another may move away. They may become quiet during conflict. They may need time alone to think. They may withdraw when conversations become emotionally intense or feel uncomfortable with being expected to immediately express what they are feeling. To someone with an anxious attachment pattern, this distance can feel like rejection. They think the other person is shutting them out or has lost interest in the relationship. Whereas the avoidant person’s internal experience may be very different. They feel overwhelmed and need space to regain a sense of control.

The difficulty is that the distance intended as protection can be experienced by the other person as abandonment. Again, two people may be responding to the same situation while having entirely different emotional experiences.

The Anxious-Avoidant Dance

Perhaps one of the most recognisable attachment patterns occurs when anxious and avoidant responses meet. One person senses distance and moves closer. The other experiences that closeness as pressure and moves away. The greater the distance, the more anxious the first person becomes. The greater the pursuit, the more overwhelmed the second person feels. Both become increasingly convinced that the other is the problem. The anxious person may think that the more the other person withdraws, the more they need to reach out. Whereas the avoidant person may think that the more they are pursued, the more they need to escape. Neither person is necessarily trying to hurt the other. Yet both may be unintentionally activating the other’s deepest fears. The cycle itself becomes the problem.

Recognising this can be an important turning point in a relationship. Instead of asking Who is right?, both people can begin asking: What is happening between us?

When Fear Pulls in Two Directions

Fearful-avoidant attachment can create an additional layer of complexity. The person may deeply desire closeness while simultaneously fearing it. They may long for intimacy and reassurance, yet become uncomfortable when someone gets emotionally close. Their experience can sometimes feel like abandonment, or they require distance to feel safe. This can be confusing for partners, family members and friends. The person’s behaviour may appear inconsistent because they are caught between two powerful needs: the desire for connection and the need for protection. They may move towards someone and then suddenly withdraw. They may want reassurance but struggle to trust it when it is offered. Understanding this pattern does not mean excusing difficult behaviour. It means recognising that what appears inconsistent on the outside may reflect an internal struggle between closeness and safety.

What Secure Attachment Brings to Communication

Secure attachment does not mean never feeling anxious, hurt or afraid. It does not mean having perfect relationships or never experiencing conflict. What it can offer is a greater ability to experience difficulty without immediately assuming that the relationship itself is under threat. Someone with a more secure attachment pattern may be better able to communicate the experience beneath their reaction.

Instead of:  You never care about me, try I’ve been feeling disconnected from you lately.

Instead of disappearing during conflict, they might say: I’m upset and need some time to think, but I want to come back to this conversation.

Secure communication does not prevent misunderstanding. It makes repair more possible.

Attachment Is Not Just About Romantic Relationships

Although attachment is often discussed in relation to couples, these patterns can also appear in families and friendships. One friend may need frequent communication to feel connected, while another may feel perfectly secure speaking less often. An adult child may seek greater emotional closeness with a parent who responds by becoming distant. A sibling’s independence may be interpreted by another as rejection. Neither person’s needs are necessarily wrong. The difficulty often begins when we assume that another person experiences connection in the same way that we do. We can easily mistake difference for rejection. We can mistake someone’s need for space as a lack of love. Or mistake someone’s need for reassurance as an attempt to control us. Attachment awareness invites us to become more curious about the meaning beneath behaviour.

From Blame to Understanding

The value of understanding attachment patterns is not in giving ourselves or others another label. We are not simply anxious, avoidant or secure people who must remain that way forever. Attachment patterns can be influenced by relationships, experiences and greater self-awareness. Beneath criticism may be a need for reassurance. Beneath withdrawal may be overwhelm. Beneath anger may be fear. Beneath distance may be a need for safety.

When we begin to hear the conversation beneath the conversation, relationships can become less about defending ourselves and more about understanding what is happening between us. Because beneath many of our conflicts is a deeply human question: Can I be close to you and still feel safe?

Further Reading

If you would like to explore attachment theory and the four commonly discussed adult attachment patterns in more detail, The Attachment Project offers accessible resources and further information on attachment theory and relationships.

Collette O’Mahony is a Psychotherapeutic Counsellor in private practice, working with clients online. She writes regularly on mental health and emotional wellbeing, with a focus on self-discovery, developing self-awareness, and supporting individuals to take meaningful responsibility for their inner lives.

From Adaptation to Authenticity: Learning to Live from the Adult Self

Leave a reply

Many of us learn early in life how to adapt ourselves to the world around us. We learn how to behave, how to gain approval, how to avoid conflict, how to be helpful, successful, quiet, independent, or responsible. These adaptations can serve us well. They help children find their place within their families and make sense of the relationships around them. But as we grow older, the strategies that once helped us belong may not always help us become fully ourselves. Adulthood brings a different question: Who am I when I am no longer simply adapting to what other people expect of me?

The Child We Learn to Be

As children, we have limited power over our environment. We depend upon adults for safety, care, approval, and belonging. It is therefore natural for a child to become highly attentive to what is expected of them. A child may learn that being good brings approval. Another may discover that achievement gains recognition. Someone else may become the peacemaker in the family, learning to anticipate other people’s moods and keep the emotional environment calm. Some children become independent very early because they learn that relying on others feels uncertain. Others become highly accommodating because maintaining connection feels particularly important. These responses are not signs of weakness. They are adaptations. The child is working out, in the best way they know, how to belong and remain emotionally safe.

When Adaptation Becomes a Pattern

As we grow older, these early adaptations can become part of our behavioural patterns. What was once a response to a particular environment can gradually become an automatic way of approaching life. The person who learned to please others may continue to put other people’s needs before their own. The child who learned to avoid conflict may become an adult who struggles to express disagreement. The child who received approval primarily through achievement may become an adult who finds it difficult to feel worthwhile without succeeding. The person who learned to manage everyone else’s emotions may find themselves continually anticipating how others will respond before allowing themselves to have their own response. These patterns can become so familiar that they feel like personality. Yet sometimes what we call “this is just who I am” is actually a learned way of being.

Understanding the Adult Self

Transactional Analysis (TA) offers a useful way of understanding these different aspects of ourselves. Within TA, the Parent, Adult, and Child ego states describe different ways of thinking, feeling, and responding. The Child can carry the emotional experiences and adaptations of earlier life. The Parent can contain messages, values, rules, and attitudes absorbed from important people around us. The Adult has a different role. The Adult is the part of us capable of observing what is happening in the present, considering information, reflecting, and making choices based on current reality. This does not mean becoming detached from emotion. The Adult is not emotionless. Rather, it allows us to recognise our emotions without automatically allowing old emotional patterns to determine our behaviour.

From Reaction to Choice

One of the important movements towards adulthood is the gradual shift from automatic reaction towards conscious choice. This can be easier to understand when we notice what happens during emotionally charged situations. Someone may receive criticism and immediately feel small, defensive, or ashamed. Another person may experience disagreement and feel an urgent need to restore harmony. Someone else may become angry when they feel controlled and respond by withdrawing or becoming oppositional. The emotional response may belong partly to the present moment, but it can also carry something familiar from the past. The Adult position allows us to pause. Instead of asking only, “Why am I reacting like this?”, we can begin asking: What is actually happening here? “What am I feeling?” “What do I need?” “How do I want to respond?” This pause creates something extremely valuable: choice.

Authenticity is Responsibility

Living authentically does not mean saying whatever comes into our minds or acting on every emotion. It is not about rejecting responsibility or ignoring the needs of others. Authenticity involves becoming more honest about our internal experience while remaining capable of considering the wider situation. We can feel angry without becoming aggressive. We can feel disappointed without blaming someone. We can disagree without creating conflict. We can say no without believing that we are a bad person. We can care about another person’s feelings without taking responsibility for regulating them. This is part of becoming responsible and psychologically adult.

When the Adapted Child Is Triggered

One of the difficulties is that old adaptations can become activated very quickly. A conversation with a parent may suddenly make an adult feel like a child again. A disagreement with a partner may trigger an intense need for reassurance. A request from a manager may evoke feelings of inadequacy or fear of disappointing someone. In these moments, the Adult can become harder to access. This is where emotional regulation becomes important. Rather than trying to suppress the reaction, we can learn to notice it. “Something in me feels threatened.” “I recognise this feeling.” “I don’t have to respond immediately.”

The aim is not to eliminate the Child or the Parent within us. These parts contain valuable experiences, emotions, values, and learning. The aim is to allow the Adult to become more available to them.

From Inherited Expectations to Personal Values

As we move through adulthood, another important question begins to emerge: What do I actually believe? Not what did my family believe. Not what will make other people happy. Not what will make me appear successful. Not what I was taught I should want. But what genuinely matters to me?

This can be surprisingly difficult. Many people reach their twenties or thirties before realising that some of their goals were inherited rather than chosen. They may have pursued a particular career because it represented success within their family. They may have entered relationships according to expectations they had never consciously examined. They may have learned that stability, achievement, marriage, independence, or financial success were the measures of a good life. There is nothing inherently wrong with any of these things. The important question is whether they are chosen.

The Courage to Reconsider

Authenticity sometimes requires us to reconsider parts of our lives that once seemed certain. This can be uncomfortable. We may discover that something we worked hard to achieve no longer feels meaningful. We may realise that a relationship pattern we once accepted no longer feels healthy. We may begin setting boundaries that others are not accustomed to. This does not necessarily mean that we are becoming selfish or difficult. Sometimes growth simply makes old patterns more visible. The challenge is learning to tolerate the discomfort that can come with doing something differently.

Becoming the Author of Our Own Life

Moving from adaptation towards authenticity is not something that happens all at once. It is a gradual process of becoming more conscious of the choices we make and the reasons behind them. We begin to notice when we are seeking approval. We recognise when fear is making a decision for us. We become aware of the difference between what we genuinely want and what we believe we should want. We learn that another person’s disappointment does not automatically mean we have done something wrong.

Slowly, the centre of decision-making moves inward. We become less dependent upon external reactions to tell us who we are.

How Therapy Can Help

This process can be difficult to navigate alone because many of our adaptations operate outside conscious awareness. Therapy provides a space to explore these patterns without judgement and to understand where they came from. It can help us recognise the difference between an old emotional response and what is actually happening in the present. It can also provide an opportunity to explore the beliefs we have inherited, the roles we have adopted, and the expectations that continue to shape our choices.

Rather than simply asking, “How can I stop doing this?”, therapy can help us ask a more useful question: “What would I choose if I were responding from my adult self?”

From there, new possibilities begin to emerge.

A Compassionate Perspective

The goal of adulthood is not to leave our childhood selves behind. The child within us carries important experiences, emotions, creativity, vulnerability, and memories. Our earlier adaptations deserve understanding rather than criticism. They helped us navigate the world we were given. But adulthood gives us something that childhood could not: greater freedom to reflect, question, choose, and change. We can honour the ways we learned to survive while deciding which ways of being we want to carry forward. Authenticity is not about becoming someone completely different. It is about gradually becoming more fully ourselves. It’s about meeting the version of ourselves that we most want to be.

Collette O’Mahony is a Psychotherapeutic Counsellor in private practice, working with clients online. She writes regularly on mental health and emotional wellbeing, with a focus on self-discovery, developing self-awareness, and supporting individuals to take meaningful responsibility for their inner lives. To book a free introduction session click here.